Several people said the films are a quasi-postscript to the book, in particular my comments on the cynical stage of contemporary laissez faire. I have been also told that some people—everyone knows who—are afraid of the book and the films. Well, it is a universal truth that nothing hurts like the truth and it is not enough to present the truth in an academic, theoretical way. Artistic fiction has value too and fighting for the truth is never too much.
Several months ago I was asked on my blog (post 994) about my opinion of Stone’s film. In it, Stone shares his vision of how today’s global economic crisis began and what caused the U.S. government buyout of Wall Street investment banks. After watching the film, I don’t think it’s Stone’s best work. I find his other films, such as “Platoon” or “JFK” better. Nevertheless, because of the polarizing nature of his themes with each new movie he has made more adversaries but also more supporters. His work proves that he is not only a great artist but a brave one as well.
An original comment left on my blog wonders if “Stone’s point of view has any basis in reality?” I believe it does. Some of the characters depicted in the film are based on real people and the movie’s plot resonates with actual events. The film’s depiction of ruthless rivalries, hostile takeovers, efforts at destroying the competition, speculation on expected earnings, manipulating markets, playing the media, and even charity balls with beautiful people is based on intelligent observation of reality.
When Gordon Gekko, the main character wonderfully depicted by Michael Douglas, advertises his book with the title “Greed is Good,” he gives the cynical overall impression of neoliberal capitalism as a machine enriching the few at the expense of the many. He uses insider slang terms for derivatives, adding that there are maybe seventy-five people in the entire world who understand the concept completely. Also, his daughter’s computer screen displays a sentence that describes the system as a method to “privatize the gains and socialize the losses.”
There is a wonderful scene in the movie showing a meeting of top New York bankers with the politicians responsible for financial policy. Such a meeting was held on Saturday, September 13, 2008, at the headquarters of the New York Federal Reserve. It was attended by Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, the then head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and current Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, and Ben Bernanke. The negotiations lasted 10 days and were very dramatic, but in the film the same event takes only a minute or so. It is either a government rescue or a great crash of the financial sector with all its consequences: thousands of bankruptcies and more than million unemployed workers. The real life decision was made and losses were socialized…
But in “Money Never Sleeps” gains must be privatized. Some cynical bankers were able to make millions of dollars that particular weekend on somebody else’s bankruptcy. Why would anybody need another several dozen million dollars? As Gordon Gekko explains, it is not the money, it is the game.
Though it is a work of fiction, “Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps” offers its own explanation for the current financial crisis However, there is a better and far more interesting film on how neoliberalism led to the financial crash only this time it is a great documentary, “Inside Job,” by Charles Ferguson. This one is a must see! If you wish to understand the true story of how money never sleeps, you should see this movie or read my new book, “Truth, Errors and Lies: Politics and Economics in a Volatile World!”