First US Real Estate Transaction in Blockchain: What's Next?

Vermont is headed towards blockchain recording of real estate transactions. Other states will follow.

Stories have been circulating about Vermont testing blockchain for recording real estate transactions.

A contact at Propy informs me that the city of South Burlington, Vermont, just became a global blockchain leader by locking in the first US real estate deed completely on blockchain.

Natalia Karayaneva, CEO of Propy said, "This is only the beginning. With this transaction, we've broken first ground in putting the $217 trillion real estate market on the blockchain. We're starting with Ukraine, but over the coming year we plan to facilitate real estate transactions with the use of PRO tokens in California, Vermont, and Dubai."

Business Insider posted this disclaimer "Propy is the source of this content."

I make the same disclaimer.

My contact says "This first deal makes it much easier for the rest of the 49 states to iterate the process. In fact, Arizona and Colorado are next."

I have some questions and will post an addendum when I have answers.


First, this is not unexpected. I have many times commented that blockchain is perfect for real estate transactions. Real estate is low-volume, high-value. Buying candy bars on blockchain is not practical. Blockchain does not scale.

Second. This does not change my attitude towards cryptos. At some point everything will be crypto, but it will be government-sponsored and it will not be Bitcoin nor Ethereum.

Finally, and most importantly, entire chains of business will vanish.

Think of the business of title insurance. Poof!

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

No. 1-25

To use automobile ownership by analogy, blockchain should do for home ownership what carfax does for automobile history. History is the key word in a title search. And for mortgages which are repackaged (who owns them) there should be a good answer for that as well, simply because the computer program will not take NO for an answer.


Come to think of it, you might have to treat your exes a little better going forwards into the future as well. Especially the ones that are notably proficient in using the internet.


Let us assume that only 1% of the population is vindictive enough to have a dodgy local developer murdered for misselling them property, would that second-order of justice not be enough to render title-deed insurance redundant?

Let me tell you, I wouldn't screw over a client with a bad title plan if I knew I could be massacred in a drive by shooting whilst walking home from Costa Coffee the following week. If I heard that this sort of thing was going on to people like me, I'd play the game very straight indeed, from then on. Just saying.


For every pious Stephen out there who accidentally hired a clumsy assassin on the internet, we might presume a plethora of Stephens who got away with soliciting murder scot-free.