Brexit Backstop Madness, UK Amendment Passes: EU Response "No Renegotiation"

-edited

Theresa May won a victory of sorts today: Parliament approved an amendment calling for a backstop change.

Brady Amendment Passes

The Brady amendment, supported by Theresa May as the way forward passed by a mere 16 votes.

May told MPs that supporting the Brady amendment would show the EU that there needed to be “significant” and “legally binding” changes to the Irish backstop to reassure MPs the UK would not be trapped within it.

Cooper Amendment Fails

An amendment backed by the Labour MP Yvette Cooper ordering the government to ask for an extension was defeated on Tuesday evening but the Commons is set to vote again in mid-February.

This is all absurd. The UK is not in a position to dictate what the EU can or cannot do.

Official Line: No Renegotiation

Theresa May knows full well that the UK parliament is not in control of this. Every EU nation would have to agree

The EU quickly responded No Renegotiation.

European Council President Donald Tusk urged the prime minister to explain her next steps, claiming the agreement negotiated over the last 20 months “remains the best and only way to ensure an orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. The backstop is part of the withdrawal agreement and the withdrawal agreement is not open for re-negotiation."

French President Emmanuel Macron also ruled out renegotiation.

Ireland's Deputy Prime Minister

Seemingly Absurd UK Position

The Guardian discusses the Absurdity of the Commons Vote.

Welsh first minister, Mark Drakeford, described the prime minister’s claim she can renegotiate the deal in the light of tonight’s votes as “staggering”.

"With no new ideas and red lines firmly still in place, the UK government is simply running down the clock in a vain hope that their deal will pass. Today has lost us more crucial time and the UK government must take decisive action and act on the majority will of parliament to rule out no deal."

Running Down the Clock

The seemingly absurd position (from a legal standpoint) is not so absurd if you under stand the true point of it all: This is an effort by May to run down the clock.

Curiously, many of the Remainers also want to run down the clock.

Both groups feel the best way to get what they want is to run down the clock then magically everyone will support their point of view.

Amendment Scorecard

Brexit Central provides the Amendment Scorecard

  • Amendment tabled by Dame Caroline Spelman Purpose: To reject the UK leaving the European Union “without a Withdrawal Agreement and a Framework for the Future Relationship”. Result: Passed by 318 votes to 310 (majority: 8)
  • Amendment tabled by Sir Graham Brady (backed by the Government) Purpose: To require that the Northern Ireland backstop be “replaced with alternative arrangements to avoid a hard border” while supporting the notion of leaving the EU with a deal and therefore supporting the Withdrawal Agreement subject to this change. Result: Passed by 317 votes to 301 (majority: 16)
  • Official Labour Amendment tabled by Jeremy Corbyn: To secure sufficient time for Parliament to consider and vote on options to prevent a no-deal Brexit and that those options should include: (i) Negotiating changes to the deal so as to secure “a permanent customs union with the EU, ... Result: Defeated by 327 votes to 296 (majority: 31)
  • Official SNP Amendment tabled by Ian Blackford: To call on the Government to seek an extension of the Article 50 period, rule out a no-deal Brexit and assert that “the people of Scotland should not be taken out of the EU against their will”. Result: Defeated by 327 votes to 39 (majority: 288)
  • Amendment tabled by Dominic Grieve Purpose: To override long-standing Commons Standing Orders and dictate that there will be six and half hours of debate on Brexit in the Commons on the six successive sitting Tuesdays beginning on 12th February on motions that will be amendable. Result: Defeated by 321 votes to 301 (majority: 20)
  • Amendment tabled by Yvette Cooper (backed by the Labour frontbench) Purpose: To override long-standing Commons Standing Orders and dictate that next Tuesday’s Commons business will be proceedings on Yvette Cooper’s European Union (Withdrawal) (No 3) Bill which would direct the Prime Minister to seek an extension of the Article 50 period until 31st December 2019. Result: Defeated by 321 votes to 298 (majority: 23)
  • Amendment tabled by Rachel Reeves Purpose: To require the Prime Minister to seek an extension of the Article 50 period if a Brexit deal has not been agreed by the House of Commons by 26th February. Result: Defeated by 322 votes to 290 (majority: 32)

Pound Speculation Ahead of the Vote

It appears Patel‏ believes Brady increases the odds of a WTO-Brexit while Cooper reduces that.

I am not so sure in practice. Neither are binding.

British Pound Reaction

Default Position

Supposedly the UK cannot leave without a deal, nor can the UK leave without alternative arrangements to a hard border.

Meanwhile, repeat after me:

  1. The default position is what it has been for two years: WTO-Brexit.
  2. There is noting to fear from a WTO-Brexit. It won't be a crash.

Preparations for that event will accelerate after today. And that will further lesson the fear of it all.

Moreover, it is reasonable to assume Dame Caroline Spelman's proposal helps in that regard.

I believe an extension will be requested, and granted, even if only to make provisions for a WTO-Brexit.

The binary choice remains: WTO-Brexit vs May's Deal.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Comments (5)
No. 1-5
gregggg
gregggg

The Brits make noise to keep the public confused... The same goes on in the US with the wall rhetoric. Both are handy just handy smokescreens for wars and takeovers (S-1).

abend237-04
abend237-04

This brouhaha reminds me of the Y2K hype and hysteria. It was a yawn event, too. Anything businesses can see coming is a guaranteed yawner, even though every politico views them as Armageddon.

stillCJ
stillCJ

Editor

Obviously the EU is not going to do anything that will help the UK with Brexit. The Brits need to just give them the finger and move on.

George_Phillies
George_Phillies

There appears to be a lack of understanding in some European circles that the UK has a real legislature, not a rubber stamp. Contrast with some European countries, in which each party is allowed whwnever it wants to remove and replace parliamentarians who do not toe the party line.

leicestersq
leicestersq

"This is all absurd. The UK is not in a position to dictate what the EU can or cannot do."

Everyone knows it is absurd. The remainers are a majority in Parliament. Both Labour and the Tories were elected on a mandate of seeing through Brexit, but most MPs in Parliament either love the EU or are paid by it in some way. So how do they keep Britain in the EU without appearing to be EU sock puppets?

What they are doing is creating an impasse where the UK isnt allowed to leave the EU until we have negotiated a deal. They know that if they can get this part in place, the EU will in turn offer deals that the UK cannot accept. Result, the UK stays in the EU.

When it comes to apportioning blame, they will all blame everyone else and no one who is actually to blame will be held accountable for anything.