Despite Record Bull Market, Pension Plans in Miserable Shape: Illinois the Worst

-edited

The amount owed to retirees accelerated faster than assets on hand despite a record bull market.

The Wall Street Journal reports the Long Bull Market Has Failed to Fix Public Pensions.

“Some of the states allowed themselves to get so underfunded that the higher returns aren’t helping them enough,” said Michael Cembalest, chairman of market and investment strategy for the asset-management arm of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and the author of an annual study on the financial health of cities and states.

Illinois Tops the Worst State List

Illinois, New Jersey and Kentucky top the list of states in worst shape on a percentage of revenue basis.

Chicago the Worst City

Worst Cities on Percentage Basis

  1. Chicago, IL
  2. Baton Rouge, LA
  3. Pittsburgh,PA
  4. Atlanta, GA
  5. Lubbock, TX

Deeper Pension Cuts Didn’t Materialize

Many states and cities reduced benefits for new employees after 2008. But deeper cuts often met resistance from judges, unions and angry constituents—even in some of the most indebted states.

The Illinois Supreme Court in 2015 threw out cuts by the legislature that were expected to save tens of billions of dollars. Kentucky’s legislature last year declined to approve the governor’s proposed cuts to cost-of-living increases for retired teachers after protests brought thousands to the state capitol and forced cancellations of classes in several school districts.

Pension Plan Assumptions

The average pension plan assumption is about 7.3%. That's not going to happen.

Please consider charts and commentary from John Hussman's April 2019 post You Are Here.

Valuations Second Highest in History

Expected Total 12 Year Return is Zero

The following chart shows nonfinancial market cap/nominal potential GDP on an inverted log scale (left), with actual subsequent 12-year S&P 500 total returns on the right scale. As usual, note that speculative bubbles always make it appear that valuations haven’t “worked” in the period immediately preceding the top, precisely because a substantial, if temporary, violation of historical norms is required to get to those extremes. As indicated by other reliable measures, investors are presently facing the likelihood of prospective nominal 12-year S&P 500 total returns averaging roughly zero.

​I remember a little boy listening to a concert at a Fourth of July celebration one year. As the music played, the little boy waved his arms as if he was conducting the orchestra. Monetary authorities are a lot like that, except that everyone who watches these kids at play actually believes that they are, in fact, conducting the orchestra.

I’m utterly mesmerized by the credulity of investors who believe that the Federal Reserve is capable of saving them from every possible contingency, no matter how irresponsible their own speculative behavior might be.

Imagine the shock of pension plans if the 12-year average is as low as 4% a year let alone a total return of zero,

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Comments (21)
No. 1-11
AWC
AWC

The greater the insolvency, the larger the bailout. That’s the magic of Centrally Planned MMT.

Snow_Dog
Snow_Dog

It’s hard to have “defined benefits” when there is no reliable definition of “defined risk” to work from.

2banana
2banana

Nothing will change.

Public unions are, by far, the all time largest campaign donors in history. They wield incredible power. And they give nearly all of it to democrats. Democrats will not cut one penny from their insane pensions or benefits.

The public unions expect taxes to be raised and raised and raised some more to cover the insane promises of payback for supporting democrats. Because a "promise is a promise" no matter how fiscally untenable it is.

There is no solution to this problem except let them all go bankrupt with no bailouts.

The best a hard working non-public union taxpayer or business can do is to use the state and city lists (from above) as a DO NOT MOVE HERE warning or a MOVE OUT OF HERE IMMEDIATELY warning list.

Guinny_Ire
Guinny_Ire

You might check out Brian Reynolds, formerly the chief strategist for Rosenblatt, on Real Vision. His thesis is that the pensions' need for a 7.5% return has driven them to buy low grade paper and that the funds for this paper has been mostly allocated to buying back stock, helping to drive the market.

Webej
Webej

Good analogy, the conductor. My favorite analogy is the rain dance. Because there is lots of capital and liquidity when the economy is going well, the Fed thinks that if it injects money, the economy will pick up. It's like making the street wet before doing a rain dance, because when it rains, the streets are wet.