Global Warming Fraud Exposed In Pictures

-edited

Climate change alarmists have convinced the public something must be done now. The reports are easily debunked as fraud.

My Gift To Climate Alarmists

Tony Heller does an amazing job of showing how the fraud takes place in his video entitled My Gift To Climate Alarmists.

The video is only 12.51 minutes long.

Cherry Picking

  • Heatwaves increasing since 1960
  • Arctic ice declining since 1979
  • Wildfires increasing since 1983
  • Sea levels rising since 1920

When you want to mislead people with statistics picking the start date is very important.

Alarmist Heat Wave Chart Shown vs Underlying Data

US Wildfires as Presented by Alarmists vs Actual Data

Please compare the right hand portion of the above chart with the lower half of the heat wave chart to see the actual correlation.

Arctic Sea Ice Extent

US Sea Level Since 1920

US Sea Level Since 1850

Sea Level Rising for 20,000 Years

Waverly Ohio

Climate Fraud Tool

Tony Heller devised software to automatically pick the perfect start date for climate alarmists to use to portray what they want.

"Most scientists are keeping their mouths shut because they they have to. They would lose their career and income if they didn't."

"Adults won't take climate change seriously. So we, the youth, are forced to strike."

"The Green New Deal reads like the communist manifesto".

Redistribute the World's Wealth by Climate Policy

The climate change activists will of course claim that such statements are out of context.

I agree they likely are. But the brainwashing of kids isn't.

Flashback 1989

Entire nations could be wiped off the earth by 2000.

Visit Real Climate Science for more information.

Heller shows some of the tricks alarmists use, but what about the actual long-term data?

Global Warming Swindle

William Land describes the actual underlying data for thousands of years in the "Great Global Warming Swindle".

The video is long. However, the data aspect is fully covered in the first 35 minutes. The rest covers the politics of what's happening. Here are some clips that I made.

Facts don't Fit the Theory

Global Warming Fraud Basics

Co2 and Temp vs Solar Activity and Temp

Carbon dioxide does not fit the global warming cycle at all. Solar activity does.

Al Gores's Ice Core examples

Al Gore's ice core tests show Gore is wrong. Carbon dioxide lags temperature by 800 years.

Temperature leads CO2 not the other way around.

Cosmic Rays Inverted vs Temperature

  • When cosmic rays went up, temperatures went down. When cosmic rays went down, temperature went up.
  • Climate is controlled by the clouds. The clouds are controlled by cosmic rays. The cosmic rays are controlled by the sun.
  • Vastly different records come together beautifully.
  • It all comes down to the sun, not CO2.

Patrick Moore Greenpeace Co-Founder

Deniers and Heretics

Scientists who speak out face "climate denier" drumbeats.

Anyone who keeps it up long enough is labeled a heretic or worse.

"The environmental movement is really a political activist movement," says the Greenpeace co-founder.

Worse yet, what should be a scientific debate, is now an unwinnable religious debate with indoctrinated kids used as tools.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Comments (208)
No. 1-53
fiat124
fiat124

Mish, thank you for sharing this. The only problem i've encountered is that if you raise ANY objections to Climate Change (tm), people think you're in the same boat as a Holocaust denier.

Mish
Mish

Editor

I posted the article at 5:30AM unfortunately, I set the date to when I started it. No one saw it until now. Reset the date but lost a lot of comment time

Bam_Man
Bam_Man

And none of this supposed "global warming" would be happening if we only paid more taxes. Riiiiiight.

JanNL
JanNL

The louder the drumbeats the more important a working BS detector. I'm a happy supporter of Tony Heller.

compsult
compsult

Many thanks for this as my wife and I just were talking about how confusing the science about climate change is.

I just finished a substantial bit of research on industry created narratives (tobacco in the 50's, Sugar in the 60's and recently, pharma in the mental health arena). It was relatively easy to see the profit motive in industry created narratives, but this climate this I could not figure the answer to Cui Bono?

Latkes
Latkes

Haw dare you, Mish!? Are you saying that the teenage girl may be misinformed? Are you saying that the girl that is being paraded around at the UN, national parliaments and all mainstream media is not a rebel speaking truth to power?

stillCJ
stillCJ

Editor

Thank you Mish, for an excellent, well researched article. Unfortunately the Climate Scare Cult is unlikely to be willing to read it.

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett

Just the setup to impose carbon tax credits.

Small business won't be able to afford tax / compliance.

Entrenching monopolies / cartels further.

Politicians will shake them down (exemptions if you donate to PACs).

Monopolies / cartels pass on increase to j6p.

Big Business ... Wins Again.

RonJ
RonJ

KTLA "News" mentioned this morning that Seattle just had snow- this September. A man wrote Armstrong and said it snowed Sept. 3 in Denver.

"Global Warming Swindle"

The purpose of climate change alarmism is to promote global socialism. Yet the socialist politicians are not panicking to cut their own carbon footprints and live like the Amish. The politicians don't believe their own climate propaganda. Neither should anyone else.

There is no climate crisis.

Webej
Webej

Of course temperature leads CO² in the ice core samples. That IS main stream climate science, not a rebuttal. The CO² picks up because of the warming (caused by changes in the distribution of insolation). But the warming is amplified and buffered by increases in CO²; the changes in temperature cannot be explained solely in terms of orbitally induced changes to the distribution of solar radiation.

Duh

bradw2k
bradw2k

You know what's alarming? About one billion people don't have reliable access to electricity.

KidHorn
KidHorn

All things being equal, rising CO2 levels will warm the earth and I think they have. But, I don't believe anyone should be alarmed over it.

Latkes
Latkes

One more thing that is being conveniently overlooked: Even if Man-made Global Warming™ is 100% real (it isn't), there is no way its effects would be all negative. It may even be a net positive, but nobody is willing to consider such unimportant details...

abend237-04
abend237-04

Thanks Mish, This is the crispest compilation I've seen on the current mass hoax that is AGW. I intend to begin using it with my kids and grandkids in any future discussions of the subject. I expect it will save me much arm-waving, shouting, flopping on the floor and frothing at the mouth. You would not believe the constant barrage of BS the kids are being subjected to in our California Public Schools on the subject. I remain convinced that, given $1 Billion annually to award in grants 'studying' the subject, I could have 97% of "scientists" agreed that roosters cause the sun to rise, and I'll do it before 2033, the 400th anniversary year of Galileo's conviction.

SMF
SMF

The 'End of the World' has been around the corner for thousands of years in one way or another, read the Book of Revelation in the Bible for example.

Experts have been calling for the end under many, many guises, including the Cold War and the War on Terrorism.

After multiple incorrect calls, logic dictates that it is all BS.

SMF
SMF

You know that this crap is political when the solutions are worse than the disease.

Somehow, burning trees for energy is now 'green', just google 'biomass burning Europe' for a laugh (or a cry).

It gets better, as biodiesel is often derived from palm oil, and palms only grow in tropical environments. Which means that in order to be 'green', many are using fuel that encourages deforestation.

WildBull
WildBull

Interesting chart on wildfires. I think that sometime in the '80s or '90s the governmetn stopped clearing brush as a measure to prevent forest fires. It was unnatural.

RustyJohn
RustyJohn

Very good article. The best reading on this is a book by an Australian Scientist Dr. Howard Brady. Its a very short book and written for the layman. It offers very clear explanations about the myriad of things that affects our climate. Highly recommended for anyone who doubts the propaganda and wants to be well informed. Its less than $10 for the kindle version. Mirrors and Mazes: a guide through the climate debate by Dr. Howard Brady https://mirrorsandmazes.com.au

Mish
Mish

Editor

A number of comments just went to the bit bucket. If you reply to someone personally call me a fraud simply for discussing what is an obvious fraud based on cherry-picking dates, then such comments are likely to be deleted

LB412
LB412

Odd... My link disappeared. If you want the opposing view take a look here: https://skepticalscience.com/

Mish
Mish

Editor

Anyone who replied to Carlos likely had their comments sent to comment heaven

crazyworld
crazyworld

I hope one days the Chinese way of acting will be an inspiration for the world because they still apply common sense as clever people should do. In 1970 China population was near one billion. At the same period India population was around 700 millions . The Chinese imposed lately one child per family and today their population is back to one billion. Nobody is starving there. Today India population is 1.4 billions living miserably on their overcrowded country. They behave like happy idiots over-here in overcrowded Europe (Netherland 700 inhabitants per square kilometer) when illegal migrants not ready to learn our culture with no technical background come in to avoid a population decrease!

As for the climate change Mish post prove of course that politic and money try always to corrupt intelligence (when there is some).

Everybody will be surprised in the future when science will find the right theory (in place of the anthropologicaly religious stupid big bang with their band-aid black matter and dark energy, relativity, 13 billions years dated for a finite universe and so on) describing how our universe really work. They just found out that even the moon has still volcanic activity which is a non sense if there is not an internal heating system promoted by some periodic field emanating from the solar system activity.(neutrinos kind possibly).

Realist
Realist

Tony Heller? LOL!

Wait……

You’re serious?

ROTFLMFAO!

Snif…...

Wait……

What happened to your Grand Solar Minimum, aka Maunder Minimum? Aren’t we supposed to be heading into an ice age now?

Denying the FACTS won’t change them Mish.

Global Warming is a Scientific Fact. And deleting posts from people who disagree with your misguided opinion will not change those Facts.

As I say; eventually, even those who try to ignore reality, will realize the truth.

You can delete my post now, if you find it too offensive.

Thanks again for your blog.

FromBrussels
FromBrussels

One can prove ANYTHING with statistics, that much is obvious again.... Whether due to human activity or not, the climate IS changing, only blind die hards won t see this, no need for no scientist to prove that warmth records are being broken year after year ! It is indeed possible that 20k years ago it was even warmer, who knows, but we weren' t 8 billion ruthless ecosystem destroyers at the time, for THAT is the only problem on this too tiny earthclod ; 8 bln smug Sapiens Apes aspiring eternal economic growth induced sick materialism, 8 bln and ticking, INSANE ! Just try to convince me for example that the exponential, never seen before destruction of pristine forests doesn' t have an impact on the climate, it would be against all logic if it didn t.....

awc13
awc13

imagine if the solution was to lower taxes and shrink the size of government. how many politicians would be on the global warming bandwagon?

FloydVanPeter
FloydVanPeter

Glaciers has been reportedly shrinking. Why?!

ts1
ts1

As noted global warming is a scientific fact. An economist writing about climatology, bears just as much weight as a dentist talking about nuclear powerplants. A bunch of homemade graphs and link to youtube videos is worth very little, if it is not backed by credible (pier reviewed) research.

SMF
SMF

'Scientific Fact' has been used to squelch real science for a long time, and it still continues.

Read your history, even Galileo was jailed over disputing known 'facts' at the time. Hell, it wasn't that long ago that dinosaurs were all cold-blooded. Or even better, it is still 'fact' in some places that dinosaurs became extinct, while more and more scientists tell us that birds descended from dinosaurs.

You can still read 'facts' about how changes occur over a period of millennia. However, evidence and recorded history note significant changes that occurred over a relatively short period of time. And that is recent recorded history.

Most scientific progress has been squelched by people claiming 'scientific fact'.

Zardoz
Zardoz

So what happened to the sea ice up north? Was it melted by fire gnomes sent by Jaweh to punish us for allowing gay marriage?

Cherry picking stats, indeed.

Country Bob
Country Bob

Thank God this fraud is finally being exposed for what it is: a giant tax grab with no scientific merit to it at all.

Global temps have been oscillating for millions of years, long before homo sapiens evolved, long before fossil fuels, long before Standard Oil. They will continue to oscillate long after G7 governments have gone the way of all the other empires in human history.

The UN and Al Gore and Greenpeace all need to be held accountable for libel. These are the same jack @sses that insisted the Earth was entering an ice age in the 1970s.... and the alleged cure for that was also higher taxes. Now global warming, and the alleged cure is higher taxes again? They aren't even trying to come up with believable bull sh!t.

If you are a left wing nut job and you want higher and higher taxes until there is mass rebellion, grow a pair and admit that is what you want. Stop trying to manufacture quack science to support your perpetual tax increases.

You know these nut jobs don't believe their own quack science when they have a global conference, and all the fraudsters show up in separate private jets. Many of the parasites didn't even pay for their own private jets, they had suckers (donors?) pay for all the flights. Each private jet burned more fuel on that flight than the average citizen uses in a year. The eco-terrorists don't believe their own bull sh!t.

The Paris Accord was signed by politicians who don't pay for their own gasoline, and rolled into their conference in heavily armored limos with dozens of escort vehicles, helicopters, and motor cycles for each crook. Once again, do what they say, not what they do. Onerous fossil fuel taxes for you, armored limos and massive entourages for us.

Tax the UN. Tax Greenpeace (and all the non-profit frauds). Make them follow the same rules as the rest of us -- or shut them down. I shouldn't be forced to pay for their free speech unless they are going to pay for mine.

Michael Francis
Michael Francis

Back in the 1970’s it was claimed the world was facing a man made ‘Ice Age’ due to global cooling with catastrophic crop failure by the year 2000 and the world being a frozen block of ice by 2020 as a result of average global temperatures falling by as much as 7 degrees

What happened.

stillCJ
stillCJ

Editor

I just got back from cruising Alaska and one day we cruised by a bunch of glaciers. There was a Park Service guy there talking about each glacier, and he had to promote the AGW melting glaciers scam. But during his talk he mentioned that there used to be an Indian village at the base of one glacier that was much smaller some time ago, but then they had to leave when the glacier moved all the way down to the ocean. Apparently the irony of that fact and his promotion of glaciers melting now never occurred to him.

Stimpson
Stimpson

Thanks Mish, very interesting. I am undecided on the cause of, and effect of, any climate change. So this is food for thought certainly. What I miss though, are source references. I would love to check the data underlying the charts. Can you include sources for the data, or where the charts came from?

rum_runner
rum_runner

It is disingenuous in the extreme to post a buffet of charts and say "see, global warming is false!"

If you dug into any one area and googled you'd find rebuttals and clear evidence as to why the trend is real. But somehow you think the world's international scientific community is all in on a vast conspiracy except for this lone ranger on the Internet named Tony Heller who is regularly and roundly rebutted.

But you have your agenda, clear as day. It's personal for you. I doubt you've spent 5 hours learning the science behind AGW and instead search for that which supports your position in the ultimate example of confirmation bias.

rum_runner
rum_runner

@Mish Right from the USDA website:

Today, fire seasons are 78 days longer than in the 1970s... Since 2000, at least 10 states have had their largest fires on record.

numike
numike

This conversation bores me for I will be dead soon enough for any of the forecasts to come to volition or not.

Mish
Mish

Editor

Stupid irony of the day: "It is disingenuous in the extreme to post a buffet of charts and say "see, global warming is false!"

What is disingenuous to the extreme is cherry picking dates and presenting them as evidence of global warming! That's what happened.

Now attacking those charts, with dates, is supposed to be "disingenuous".

Wow - Ass Freaking Backwards

Justice Trufaux
Justice Trufaux

Another great job Mish! Mr Heller was on Grimerica last week too and is also well worth the listen. https://grimerica.ca/2019/09/22/378-tony-heller/

Thanks for helping to preserve freedom and Truth!

Zardoz8045
Zardoz8045

This article is fine for supporting global warming deniers, but in the real world respectable people don't care what Tony Heller or "Lord" Monckton or the publisher of this has to say. In the real world people work hard, with integrity. In the real world publishers care about their reputations. In the real world peer review is how reality is known.

Enjoy your warming climate denial delusions, because the scale of change is orders of magnitude beyond anything we can do to slow it down. It is unlikely there will be habitat for humans by 2026.

viii Forward 1979 'Charney Report'

The conclusions of this brief but intense investigation may be comforting to scientists but disturbing to policymakers. If carbon dioxide continues to increase, the study group finds no reason to doubt these changes will be negligible. The conclusions of prior studies have been generally reaffirmed. However, the study group points out that the ocean, the great and ponderous flywheel of the global climate system, may be expected to slow the course of observable climate change. A wait-and-see policy may mean waiting until it is too late.

Notoldyet68
Notoldyet68

Very interesting - but a few questions. If there were periods where the earth was warmer in the not to distant past, is there data on what caused this. Is it possible to know whether increased solar insolution (?) or other factors caused past warming. Regarding the warming that has been occurring since about 1840, is there anything that will account for this other than the increase in CO and methane in the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels. There should be data that would account for alternative explanations. Everything has a cause. Maybe warming could occur due to increases in the solar radiation AND/or from an increase in CO/methane?

GerrysR6
GerrysR6

What a minute... you are saying the sun warms the Earth? Incredible observation! Who could have known? All that analysis and you still blow it. 1 + 1 = 11 according to Mish logic. All those dumb climate scientists, outsmarted by an economist. If you think global warming is a fraud you are a fucking idiot.

JiiVee
JiiVee

Great article Mish.

Few other points:

1. IPCC was started to analyze and collect in their reports studies about human caused climate change so if they made a report that stated that climate change is not caused by humans they would make themselves redundant and nobody ever made a report about themselves that would cause their job to be useless and lead to their firing.

2. IPCC is a self-selecting clique and the more alarmist study one makes the more likely they will be invited to be part of IPCC. For example Michael Mann was invited to IPCC to collect studies and write the reports after his famous and debunked hockeystick so every climate change "scientist" has an incentive to make alarmist studies to get into IPCC.

3. Once people are in IPCC they can pick their own studies to be included in the IPCC and getting your reports in IPCC reports of course increases scientists prestige and makes them famous and enables them to get more funding.

4. EU gives grants to study human caused climate change so if you study that you get grant money for your studies but if once getting such grant you would find that there is no human caused climate change then that would be the last grant you got. Does USA still have scientific grants like this or has Trump stopped them?

5. There are hundreds of billions at stake in the EU cap-and-trade scheme that EU gave into private hands. Goldman Sachs runs the EU cap-and-trade scheme and those companies that have water power get carbon credits to sell to other companies like coal plants and factories. Many banks and investment companies also invest in the carbon credits and EU recently removed large amount of credits from the market to increase the fight against climate change and those that had invested in carbon credits that were not removed by EU made 400% times their investment after the price of carbon credits rose. After this 400% increase many companies started closing their factories so the coming EU depression is partly caused by EU through their removal of carbon credits from the markets to intentionally boost the prices of carbon credits to fight climate change.

If EU had a clue they would have handled their cap-and-trade scheme themselves so that EU would have sold the credits themselves and funded all investments into fighting climate change by selling the credits and kept the prices stable or slightly increasing instead of 400% jumps. Somebody from Goldman Sachs and energy companie with water power got into EU bureaucrats ears and convinced them that it is better to just give a gift of hundreds of billions in value to them and let bankers and investors speculate in carbon credits. So EU created a never ending siphoning mechanism of money from coal plants and factories into the pockets of bankers and investors and companies with water power and gave hundreds of billions of money to them instead of using it for EU budget and climate change investments.

6. The scarier the predictions and the more dire the studies the more the scientists get publicity which leads to young eager female scientists and students wanting to work with them to save the world and the more publicity one gets the easier it is to get grant funding.

7. Many scientists hide their raw data and methods of their studies so nobody can replicate them using basic scientific process and confirm they get the same results with the data using the same methods so climate change science is a black box pseudo science.

8. Many parts of the world have complately invented temperatures since there is no measuring stations but they still have temperatures put into these areas in the studies and "surprisingly" these invented temperatures are always very high.

9. The temperatures are now in many studies not just measured temperatures and invented temperatures but also include corals and tree growth etc. from which the temperatures are supposedly calculated from and fail to take into account that in many places tree growth is mainly dependent on rains and not temperatures and similar biases.

10. Urban heat island effect creates increasing temperatures when the measuring station surroundings get more asphalt roads and parking lots and more buldings which trap suns rays and get heated as a result and then release this heat. Also increase in car traffic has an effect as does increase in air traffic for those measuring stations that are in airports due to the exhaust heat from cars and planes.

11. The Eastern Europe closed many mesuring stations so there is less measuring stations and more invented temperatures since the 1990's.

12. The measuring stations have their places switched sometimes to a new place nearby and in Pokka measuring station in Kittila Finland locals are complaining that they stopped measuring temperatures from the old site and built a new site higher up and the new measuring station has 5 degrees celsius warmer measurements than the old one when it is winter so this change of measuring station caused a 5 degree celsius raise in temperatures aka 5 degree celsius global warming just by changing he place of the measuring station. The locals are upset because Pokka, Kittila is famously the coldest place in finland with measurement of -51,5 celsius and they think that nobody they will never break that record and get the massive publicity which would follow.

13. All the climate change models have been wrong so far when time passes and actual temperatures are measured and instead of admitting they were wrong they just adjust the models to cause their charts to copy reality so far and make just as outlandish predictions for the future.

14. The media is in total hysteria and IPCC reports are treated as sacred truth despite IPCC being regularly wrong so far.

15. The original report by UNEP before they started IPCC predicted up to +7 degrees celsius global warming by now and island nations should have diasappeared into the sea in the 2000's already when in actuality island nations are increasing in size except those where erosion has a bit larger effect after the islanders have lifted huge amounts of rough sand from the seabanks surrounding their island to make cement.

MarioVR
MarioVR

Tony Heller's work is great but the problem is he is a terrible speaker (almost unbearable to listen to) . We should hire Al Gore to present his arguments!

Syllabub
Syllabub

Thank you for this summation, I'm curious as to who is going to profit from this climate change business.

dpwozney
dpwozney

Historical climate change might be real, but the evidence presented to date, in an attempt to prove that any recent imagined climate change is caused by man, is neither convincing nor compelling. No one has yet proven that man-made carbon dioxide emissions cause any supposed global warming or alleged climate change.

Much key claimed "data", used to claim supposed global warming or alleged climate change, has not been, and does not become, personally verified and confirmed by people who are independent of certain governments which have a certain political and financial agenda. For example, the authenticity of most Arctic "data", unlike some data from lower latitudes, is not verified and confirmed by people independent of governments.

However, snow cover maps or data in the coldest months, at lower latitudes, can be at least somewhat partially verified and confirmed independently of governments. Snow cover data in the coldest months shows a trend since 1967 of increasing extent of yearly maximum snow cover in the northern hemisphere. Snow cover extent, at lower latitudes, in the months of December, January, and February can be somewhat partially verified and confirmed by large numbers of people independent of governments.

http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=1&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=12">http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=1&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=12 http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=1&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=1 http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=1&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=2

Science involves the need for independent verification and independent confirmation of empirical data, observations, measurements, etc.

sam111111
sam111111

I don't get it y'all. the earth's atmosphere is a gas bubble, right? so all these arguments fighting the data that burning fossil fuels impacts that gas bubble ... means nothing bad will happen if we keep doing it? didn't we have to pass laws so that LA could get breathable again? seems pretty basic that this is essentially a debate around pollution, and I don't understand why people are so intent on continuing to pollute?

PotterL
PotterL

This article is debunked here: https://youtu.be/XjPkclkZh6o

Herkie
Herkie

Man made global warming is no longer a subject for debate between reasonable scientific minds, for all intents and purposes it is now a religion in which you are either a self flagellating devotee, or a heretic to be burned at the stake publicly.

The very definition of SCIENCE has even changed, where it use to include the word skeptical that has now been dropped and you can google that for yourself, not that they make a point of it, the word has just quietly disappeared from the definition. Funny yes? The very thing that makes science science, skepticism, is now what makes you an antisocial criminal bent on destruction of the world.

Man made global warming has all the hallmarks of a religion; a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

The only difference is that where in past religions the cause was superhuman as in gods, it is now superhuman to the extent no one human, or small group is consciously causing the effects, but any words that can be construed as open to questioning it are just as heretical.