Here's the key paragraph:
"About three years ago the FOMC judged that the interests of households and businesses, of savers and borrowers, were no longer best served by such extraordinarily low rates. We therefore began to raise our policy rate gradually toward levels that are more normal in a healthy economy. Interest rates are still low by historical standards, and they remain just below the broad range of estimates of the level that would be neutral for the economy‑‑that is, neither speeding up nor slowing down growth. My FOMC colleagues and I, as well as many private-sector economists, are forecasting continued solid growth, low unemployment, and inflation near 2 percent. "
The key words are "just below neutral". The market's apparent interpretation is that the Fed is about done hiking.
In his speech Powell made reference to 1929.
For Economic Club of New York trivia buffs, I will note that the second ever presentation to this club by a Federal Reserve official was about this very topic. The date was March 18, 1929. Weeks before, the Fed had issued a public statement of concern over stock market speculation, and had provided guidance frowning on bank funding of such speculation. William Harding, a former Fed Chair and then president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, defended the Fed's actions in his talk. He argued that, while the Fed should not act as the arbiter of correct asset prices, it did have a primary responsibility to protect the banking system's capacity to meet the credit needs of households and businesses. At the meeting, critics argued that public statements about inflated asset prices were "fraught with danger;" that the nation's banks were so well managed that they should not "face public admonition"; and, more generally, that the Fed was "out of its sphere." Of course, Harding spoke just a few months before the 1929 stock market crash, which signaled the onset of the Great Depression.
The implied message here is the Fed won't let another crash happen again.
Fed Monitoring Triggers
Powell stated the Fed was "Monitoring Likely Triggers for Financial Distress."
Powell's own assessment: "My own assessment is that, while risks are above normal in some areas and below normal in others, overall financial stability vulnerabilities are at a moderate level."
The implied message is the Fed has everything under control.
Valuations and Forward PE's
Looking across the landscape of major asset classes, we see some classes for which valuations seem high relative to history. For example, even after standard adjustments for economic conditions, valuations on riskier forms of corporate debt and commercial properties are in the upper ends of their post-crisis distributions, although they are short of the levels they hit in the pre-crisis credit boom. We see no major asset class, however, where valuations appear far in excess of standard benchmarks as some did, for example, in the late 1990s dot-com boom or the pre-crisis credit boom.
The asset class that gets the most attention day-to-day is, of course, the stock market. Today, equity market prices are broadly consistent with historical benchmarks such as forward price-to-earnings ratios. It is important to distinguish between market volatility and events that threaten financial stability. Large, sustained declines in equity prices can put downward pressure on spending and confidence. From the financial stability perspective, however, today we do not see dangerous excesses in the stock market.
Referencing forward PE's is a complete joke. Forward PE's always look good at market peaks and they always look horrendous at recession bottoms when sales are dismal.
In his speech conclusion, Powell offered these lines: "Eternal vigilance is the price of financial stability. We will publish these reports regularly as part of our vigilance."
The implied message is that not only does the Fed have everything under control, it's also exercising "eternal vigilance" so that it stays that way.
Eternal Vigilance My Ass
The Fed blew major bubbles in 2000, 2007, and again now.
- Greenspan failed to recognize the dotcom bubble. Instead he embraced a "productivity miracle".
- Bernanke repeatedly denied there was a housing bubble.
- Yellen and Powell both failed to spot obvious stock market bubbles.
Eternal vigilance my ass. These alleged wizards could not spot a flamingo in a pen full of turkeys.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock